The Battle for Wesnoth Forums

There is missing feedback to sixth scenario, so I leave feedback for it here: (1) Normal difficulty, ver. 1.12.5. (2) 2. (3) Very clear. (4) Boring. (5) Do not lose high-level troops. (6) 5. (7) More challenging. Perhaps less gold or less time. And there also too little space for three players. (8) ...

(1) Normal difficulty, ver. 1.12.5. (2) 2. (3) Very clear. (4) Boring. (5) Do not lose high-level troops. (6) 5. (7) more challenging. I suppose not too much gold on start (8) No such event was. I know it's copy-pasting, but all scenarios from second have same problem. Is there a bug? I and my ally ...

(1) Normal difficulty, ver. 1.12.5. (2) 2. (3) Very clear. (4) Average. (5) Do not lose high-level troops. (6) 5. (7) More challenging. Perhaps less amount of gold from start, or less time for finishing (8) No such event was. Is there a bug? I and my ally had huge amount of gold (wich we spent half ...

(1) Normal difficulty, ver. 1.12.5. (2) 2. (3) Very clear. (4) Average. (5) Do not lose high-level troops. (6) 8. (7) more challenging. I suppose not too much gold on start (8) No such event was. Is there a bug? I and my ally had huge amount of gold (wich we spent half of it) there were quick defenc...

(1) Normal difficulty, ver. 1.12.5. (2) 2. (3) Very clear. (4) Average. (5) Do not lose high-level troops. (6) 7. (7) More challenging, perhaps not so much gold from start, or less time to finish scenario. (8) No such event was. Is there a bug? I and my ally had huge amount of gold (wich we spent ha...

Played in 1.12.5

(1) Normal, two players.
(2) 5.
(3) Very clear.
(4) Average.
(5) Quick rush.
(6) 9.
(7) None needed.
(8) Was chosen wrong leader for killing.