Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
Moderator: Forum Moderators
- artisticdude
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: December 15th, 2009, 12:37 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the middle of everything
Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
As per this thread, the current mainline rogue baseframes (male and female) are up for revision, and AFAIK no one has attempted to revise them to date. As you may have noticed, Mefisto and I have been working on these in my thread in the Art Workshop, and I thought it was about time to continue the discussion to where more artists would notice.
Here is the current state of things (new versions on the top, old ones at the bottom): Thoughts?
Here is the current state of things (new versions on the top, old ones at the bottom): Thoughts?
"I'm never wrong. One time I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken."
-
- Art Contributor
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: December 7th, 2006, 8:08 pm
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
I very much hope the "tentacles of hair" as seen on your female rogue have not become the standard for Wesnoth, because they make me think of something like this:
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
Ouch. While the hair doesn't make me think of an octopus (though I see what he means), I'm more in favor of the old version too. Shorter cropped hair would probably be more fitting for the unit's "character" while the new version is just generic girl.
Aside from the hair, the legs look better, I think. It is kind of a minor change though. At least it shouldn't affect the animations.
Aside from the hair, the legs look better, I think. It is kind of a minor change though. At least it shouldn't affect the animations.
BfW 1.12 supported, but active development only for BfW 1.13/1.14: Bad Moon Rising | Trinity | Archaic Era |
| Abandoned: Tales of the Setting Sun
GitHub link for these projects
| Abandoned: Tales of the Setting Sun
GitHub link for these projects
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
The new stance makes them look like they are either in the middle of a defense animation, or about to fall over.
Regarding the hair, shorter hair probably makes more sense for stealth fighters like these.
Regarding the hair, shorter hair probably makes more sense for stealth fighters like these.
Author of the unofficial UtBS sequels Invasion from the Unknown and After the Storm.
- artisticdude
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: December 15th, 2009, 12:37 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the middle of everything
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
Well, at least the torsos of these new ones are useable, I guess.
That's not why I went with the long hair, though; I thought it would visually assist in the impression of the unit being female, besides just the more prominent bust. There seems to be a general consensus (both here on the forums and elsewhere) that shorter hair is better though, so I guess I'll go with shorter instead of longer hair.
Eh, point taken. I shouldn't have focused so heavily on individual "strands" like that.Blarumyrran wrote:I very much hope the "tentacles of hair" as seen on your female rogue have not become the standard for Wesnoth, because they make me think of something like this:
doofus-01 wrote:While the hair doesn't make me think of an octopus (though I see what he means), I'm more in favor of the old version too. Shorter cropped hair would probably be more fitting for the unit's "character" while the new version is just generic girl.
It's worth noting here that the female rogue/thief portrait has long hair.shadowmaster wrote:Regarding the hair, shorter hair probably makes more sense for stealth fighters like these.
That's not why I went with the long hair, though; I thought it would visually assist in the impression of the unit being female, besides just the more prominent bust. There seems to be a general consensus (both here on the forums and elsewhere) that shorter hair is better though, so I guess I'll go with shorter instead of longer hair.
The new stance is noticeably more dynamic than the old one, perhaps too much so, but I honestly don't think they look off-balance. Although that reminds me, Alarantalara had an interesting suggestion regarding the pose:shadowmaster wrote:The new stance makes them look like they are either in the middle of a defense animation, or about to fall over.
Would that be worth trying?Alarantalara wrote:...it would be really neat to be able to use the less dynamic pose from earlier most of the time and switch when an enemy unit is nearby.
"I'm never wrong. One time I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken."
-
- Art Contributor
- Posts: 1700
- Joined: December 7th, 2006, 8:08 pm
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
Personally I violently hate these "active" stances, partly because they suggest a very close distance between hexes, but as much as I understand exactly this kind of "active stances" are a major element of the current target of the art direction of sprites, so it fits that
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
I like the idea personally, but it might conflict with the heaving/bobbing/dancing project.Although that reminds me, Alarantalara had an interesting suggestion regarding the pose:Would that be worth trying?Alarantalara wrote:...it would be really neat to be able to use the less dynamic pose from earlier most of the time and switch when an enemy unit is nearby.
BfW 1.12 supported, but active development only for BfW 1.13/1.14: Bad Moon Rising | Trinity | Archaic Era |
| Abandoned: Tales of the Setting Sun
GitHub link for these projects
| Abandoned: Tales of the Setting Sun
GitHub link for these projects
- artisticdude
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: December 15th, 2009, 12:37 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the middle of everything
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
Short hair returns: no more Ms. Squid. Other than that, nothing major has changed.
I'm tempted to suggest that you could have a standing animation for both the dynamic and the non-dynamic poses, but that'd be twice as much work if and when they were animated...doofus-01 wrote:I like the idea personally, but it might conflict with the heaving/bobbing/dancing project.
"I'm never wrong. One time I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken."
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
While I don't think such an active pose would work for all units, it does seem more fitting for the rogue. You've done some nice work there. I think it does look better without the "squid" hair.
http://www.wesnoth.org/wiki/User:Sapient... "Looks like your skills saved us again. Uh, well at least, they saved Soarin's apple pie."
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
Honestly, the hair you made was really quite nice, blarumyyran's comments really aren't warranted, because sprite art will always have unwanted possible interpretations - it's the very nature of working in such a small medium where elements have to be suggested rather than explicitly drawn; you cannot directly render things, and some people will always look at it and see something else. Thus it's usually not a valid critique.
It's possible we could tone down the separation a tad, but largely it's quite good work.
As for the body of the unit, you've nailed it. Great work!
It's possible we could tone down the separation a tad, but largely it's quite good work.
As for the body of the unit, you've nailed it. Great work!
Play Frogatto & Friends - a finished, open-source adventure game!
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
Like so - I think the upper-right one in this would be ready to move forward with.
Yes, they're emphatically what we're going for - a "fighting pose" like one's opponent is a few paces away. Canonical hex size be damned, that's what wesnoth looks like. The body pose on this is exactly what I was hoping for.Blarumyrran wrote:Personally I violently hate these "active" stances, partly because they suggest a very close distance between hexes, but as much as I understand exactly this kind of "active stances" are a major element of the current target of the art direction of sprites, so it fits that.
- Attachments
-
- rogue_revision.png (7.77 KiB) Viewed 22115 times
Play Frogatto & Friends - a finished, open-source adventure game!
- artisticdude
- Moderator Emeritus
- Posts: 2424
- Joined: December 15th, 2009, 12:37 pm
- Location: Somewhere in the middle of everything
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
Aha, that's awesome! Much better than my attempt. Needless to say, I shall study this edit extensively.Jetrel wrote:Like so - I think the upper-right one in this would be ready to move forward with.
Thanks, glad you think so!Jetrel wrote:As for the body of the unit, you've nailed it. Great work!
So now that these are more or less finalized, I'd really like to have a go at animating them. Unfortunately I'm tied up for the next two weeks with college entry exams, but after that the academics begin to wind down approaching summer, so I'll probably be able to take a stab at these.
Although in the meantime, if anyone else feels like taking a shot at animating them, please don't let me stop you.
"I'm never wrong. One time I thought I was wrong, but I was mistaken."
Re: Rogue Baseframes Overhaul
You've got backup from me when you do - I'm not gonna take over, since I'm thinking about polishing off the missing frames for the L2 & 3 ghosts.
Play Frogatto & Friends - a finished, open-source adventure game!